Pre fieldwork

Was asked for advice on preparation for field research today…

It is always a good question. I think most anthropologists, in preparation for fieldwork, write a fairly critical ethical reflection on what they are about to do, but invariably the actual doing of it throws up things they could not really have anticipated. That in itself is interesting, and good. A kind of dialectic based on preparing for the unexpected. Perhaps this can be called the great philosophical angst and reflection form of the existential conundrum – boiled down to: how can you get yourself ready to be surprised?

Methods courses have always somehow been about this. The anthropologist or sociologist is someone who trains to seek out what they do not know. Most especially, or maybe ideally, to find something that they probably don’t even know they are looking for. How can this even be taught? Maybe it is a philosophical attitude, maybe it requires a certain kind of person, maybe it is always self-deception? We do tend to seek out what fits our understanding, what confirms our view of the world. Yet we also try to recognise that the only reason for doing anything is really to find out if it’s possible to see the world differently that we do now.

My advice is always to stay prepared for what you cannot be prepared for, even if it means disregarding advice… An old book, Kurt Wolff ‘Surrender and Catch’ might be worth a look in this regard.

and yet

On the other hand, my position has usually been that anthropologists and sociologists should not be inflicted upon the world. Keep them home – a moratorium on fieldwork for 20 years…

Iceland bible note

seeking out various links, not really knowing where they will lead. Reading the newspaper Friend of India from 1819, published in Serampore, this report on the distribution of bibles in Iceland caught my eye. Serampore Mission publishing house was the first translator of the bible into Bengali. This however treats of Iceland and poetry, though the flourish of words in the prose preamble is itself worth of study.
Screen Shot 2014-11-18 at 06.56.21
Screen Shot 2014-11-18 at 06.57.13
Screen Shot 2014-11-18 at 06.57.38
Screen Shot 2014-11-18 at 06.58.44
Later, the same newspaper reports a story from a meeting of an anti-slavery group [Wilberforce in attendance] with mention of an ‘industrious girl’ spinning cotton. Recall that the export of spun cotton to India destroyed local weavers’ livelihoods… and left their bones bleaching on the plains (Marx in the NYDT 1853 quoting Gov-General William Bentinck).
Screen Shot 2014-11-18 at 07.01.38
All this is from Friend of India Annual, Vol 2 1819 Serampore: Mission Press
Moral of the story: do not give money to these god-botherin’ people.