Banking 101 USO today!
University of Strategic Optimism
Uploaded by GraveRiddle. – News videos from around the world.

Flash Bank: Inaugural lecture from the University of Strategic Optimism, held in Lloyds TSB, London Bridge on 24/11/2010

See lecture two here and Visit the University for Strategic Optimism for syllabus and application form (no actual form, just make up your own version)

4 thoughts on “Banking 101 USO today!”

  1. Goldsmiths Centre for Cultural Studies has always been short of space, and this group have hit upon what seemed the sensible way to expand Centre activities.


  2. The University of Strategic Optimism gets a mention on the front page of today’s Metro – look at the Twitterati bit at the top. Job well done!


  3. Article about UfSO’s Inaugural Lecture in the context of Bernard Tschumi’s conception of Space.

    […] In his essay Space and Events, Tschumi wrote: “There is no space without event, no architecture without programme.” “Architecture”, he went on to say, “could not be dissociated from the events that ‘happened’ in it”. In part, this statement was intended as a critique of the narrow functionalism inherited from Modernism. The relationship of form to function for Tschumi was far from straightforward. Event, particularly political event, had the capacity to disrupt simple causal relationships between the two, allowing the possibility that anywhere could be used for anything, at any time.

    The occupation this week of a Lloyds TSB by the University of Strategic Optimism, would seem to fit into just such a dissonant notion of space disrupted by event. How many architects though would recognise the University of Strategic Optimism as a piece of design? The overlaying of one programme – lecture hall – over another – bank – is clearly only half the story.

    Both ‘Bank’ and ‘University’ are typological classifications of use and not descriptions of architecture after all. Their forms may have grown up to reflect and embody the activities that occur within them – spatial representations of the social relationships involved – but they remain capable of being re-used and reoccupied for anything. The lack of fit of form to function is, in Tschumi’s terms at least, what makes the USO radical. It doesn’t belong there.

    The relationship between form and function is not instrumental or straightforwardly causal. As Tschumi says, “Murder in the street, is different from murder in the cathedral”. Neither the building nor the programme are left unaffected by such radical occupations. It’s almost instantaneous dissemination via YouTube etc. though gives it a weird kind of permanent impermanence. […]

    To read the full article head to Charles Hollands excellent fantastic journal

    Charles Holland is an architect and director of Fat [Fashion, Architecture, Taste]


Comments are closed.