Nepal in 2006

Another bit of text that has to be chopped from my Pantomime Terror book – this time because its no longer news, though I do note that today the Maoists are reported to be actively boycotting the election. And we know what an active boycot can mean. Go!

Here is the cut, sadly now left to rot on the study floor…

And lets take a lesson from Nepal, which in the same week in which Aki Nawaz was identified by The Sun as the pantomime caricature of the ‘suicide rapper’, the Nepalese Government, amidst its own Maoist ‘insurgency’, still repealed some of its ‘anti-terror’ in the interests of civic freedoms. The Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Ordinance (TADO) earlier introduced by King Gyanendra in the wake of the 2002 killing of his brother Birendra and ten members of the ruling Rana Royal family. The King was forced to repeal the terror laws by popular pressure from the insurgent Maoist movement, heading (April 2008) towards democratic electoral victory at pace. Yet beyond Nepal (further discussed in a later chapter), the war on terror has contracted rather than opened up civic space. It is my view that any exposure of such strictures is to be supported. Where is the discussion of the repeal of the terror laws and other fear-mongering that is making life in Britain untenable?

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

Trackbacks

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,687 other followers

%d bloggers like this: