malmo

A note for Malmo:

I am looking forward to this visit to Malmo (third item here) to talk about movement and home. Happy to be asked, and I would be very keen to start with some very brief comments.

Obsessing about things like this for a while now, I would – so there are no big surprises – first suggest that we could start working against a geographical model of the Border or the Boundary. If we recognize the border is not just the port, but the entire city, as in “everywhere, in everything we do”, in each interaction between people related, somehow somewhere to belonging – how violent this is – if we recognize the border as a wall between us all, then we might see reason to have to reconfigure the very idea of nation, boundary and movement that so distracts us. Secondly, the border is not just at the edge, but at any port, at the immigration office, in the postal service that delivers the visa, in the police checks, the detention procedure – in the everyday reactions of people to each other even as they stand and stare. Thirdly, if we think of the way sound and meaning travels across the border, might we start to develop ways of thinking critically against this geographic boundary – and the old models of nation, culture, race that the border secures. What would it be to ask critically about, and so reject, the way we have fixed the border through property, maps, geography – and so leave that space that has been deaf to other movements, transmissions, resonances. Would this work things differently, otherwise?

I will have to think of some examples to make this less abstract, they are everywhere.

The above developes this.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

Trackbacks

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,688 other followers

%d bloggers like this: